Skip to content
Close Menu
The Concho Observer
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Drought and Weather
  • Business Directory
  • SUMMER FUN
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Report About Local Doctor’s DWI Arrest Spiked
  • Fun July 4th Weekend Set for San Angelo
  • Data Center Permits Detail Proposed Air Quality Footprint
  • Police Say Woman Confessed to Brutal Homicide
  • THEATRE: What Does The Constitution Mean To You?
  • Local United Way Reports Employee Misconduct
  • Ballot Access Reform in Texas Long Overdue
  • Final Spaceport Meetings Slated for This Week
Facebook Instagram TikTok
The Concho Observer
Subscribe
Monday, June 29
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Drought and Weather
  • Business Directory
  • SUMMER FUN
The Concho Observer
Home » TIRZ Process Ignored By City Council
Opinion

TIRZ Process Ignored By City Council

EditorBy EditorMay 27, 2025Updated:May 27, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Email Copy Link
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
Jeff Chandler Law

On May 20, 2025, the San Angelo City Council voted to shut down the opportunity for non-profit organizations to apply for Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) funding—three years after allowing such applications.

This issue began on August 2, 2022, when I attended a City Council meeting and asked for clarification on whether TIRZ funds could be used for non-profits. At that meeting, Mayor Brenda Gunter stated clearly that non-profits were not eligible because they do not pay taxes.


However, just two weeks later, on August 16, 2022, the Council passed a motion—approved by both TIRZ and the City Council—to combine the North and South zones into one unified policy. During that meeting, it was explicitly stated that non-profit organizations in the South were not eligible for TIRZ funding, except for government entities.

Yet, it was also noted that North Side non-profits could apply at any time.

Alpha Paving Ad

Despite earlier statements, it is important to note that nothing in the Texas Comptroller’s regulations disqualifies non-profits from applying for TIRZ funds. The City Council knew from the beginning that non-profits like churches do not pay property taxes—yet they allowed them to apply anyway.

Gethsemane Church submitted an application on August 22, 2022. Over the following three years, the TIRZ board reviewed and approved the application. However, the City Council rejected it, again citing that the church did not pay taxes and therefore was not eligible.

I believe that is not a valid reason. The City Council knowingly opened the door for non-profits to apply—despite their tax-exempt status—and allowed the process to continue for three years.

On January 7, 2025, the City Council initially voted to approve Gethsemane’s application. Yet Mayor Brenda Gunter and Council member Tom Thompson continued to object, repeating the same point—that non-profits do not pay taxes.

At the January 7, 2025 meeting, Tom Thompson stated that non-profits should never have been allowed to apply and that he should have removed that provision back in 2017.

So, the question remains: Why did the City Council approve the process for non-profits to apply in the first place? If the tax-exempt status was always going to disqualify them, it was misleading—and a waste of everyone’s time and resources—to accept applications that were “dead on arrival.”

This isn’t about Gethsemane Church being denied funding. The real issue is that non-profits were encouraged to apply, and then ultimately disqualified for a reason that was already known when the process was opened. That, in my view, is gross negligence and a misuse of taxpayer time and money.

Gethsemane Church followed the process properly. Everything was done decently and in order.

I believe that now former Mayor Brenda Gunter and current Mayor Tom Thompson owe Gethsemane Church—and the citizens of San Angelo—an apology. This situation was mishandled from the start. An apology may never come, but I choose to forgive them for accepting applications that were never going to be approved.

It should not have taken three years to close the door on this process. Instead, the Council let it continue, giving the appearance that approval was still possible—when in truth, it never was.

—A concerned citizen who simply tried to do things the right way.

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading…
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor

Related Posts

Ballot Access Reform in Texas Long Overdue

June 23, 2026

TRUTHE: Sacred Ground is No Place for Fool’s Arch

June 11, 2026

Pollster Sends Out Local Data Center Survey

May 4, 2026

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter

This is our main newsletter. It contains the latest stories published on our website from the last week. It goes out on Wednesday at Noon.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Postal Annex Ad
Archive
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Bluesky TikTok
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Ethics
  • Financials
  • Commenting
  • Business Directory
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

%d