Skip to content
Close Menu
The Concho Observer
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Business Directory
  • Football Schedules
  • ELECTION 2026
  • Varmints
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Is Rapper Welfare Fraud Worse Than Quarterback Welfare Fraud?
  • Artists Teach Fundamentals of Plein Air Painting at SAMFA
  • Sen. Perry Frames 2027 Legislature in San Angelo Town Hall
  • Round Up: Court Hears About Hospital Reimbursements
  • Round Up: City Advances Wastewater Funding Application
  • NTX Wildlife Center: “Ditch The Jimothy Toys!”
  • SAMFA Seeks Artists for World Record Attempt
  • Save Carver Coalition Argues for Preservation of Historic Campus
Facebook Instagram TikTok
The Concho Observer
Subscribe
Sunday, October 25
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Business Directory
  • Football Schedules
  • ELECTION 2026
  • Varmints
The Concho Observer
Home » John Deere Settles “Right to Repair” Lawsuit for $99 Million
Agriculture

John Deere Settles “Right to Repair” Lawsuit for $99 Million

Associated PressBy Associated PressApril 7, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Email Copy Link
Deere and Company opened in 1836 specializing in black smithing and plow blades. Photo from Deere.com.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
Jeff Chandler Law

ASSOCIATED PRESS

by WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS

NEW YORK — Deere & Co. has agreed to pay $99 million as part of a settlement that would resolve a class action lawsuit accusing the farm equipment giant of monopolizing repair services.

The Moline, IL based manufacturer, which does business under the John Deere brand, has faced a handful of “right to repair” complaints over the years.

The deal announced Monday — which still needs final approval from the court — would settle a 2022 lawsuit that accused the company of withholding repair software and conspiring with authorized dealers to force farmers to use their services for repairs, when they could otherwise fix tractors and other equipment themselves or use independent alternatives.

The plaintiffs alleged that meant Deere and its dealers could charge higher, “supracompetitive” prices and reap benefits from an “unlawfully restrained” market, per court filings.

Postal Annex Ad

Deere has continued to deny any wrongdoing, and maintained Monday it’s dedicated to supporting customers’ ability and access needed to repair their equipment. But the company agreed to the settlement “to move forward and remain focused on what matters most — serving our customers,” Denver Caldwell, vice president of aftermarket and customer support, said in a statement.

Under the proposed agreement, filed in federal court in Illinois, the $99 million would go into a settlement fund for class members who paid Deere or its authorized dealers for large agriculture equipment repairs between Jan. 10, 2018 until the date of the deal’s preliminary approval.

The company also agreed to additional injunctive relief, aimed at strengthening the availability of repair resources and things like diagnostic checks.

Beyond this case, Deere still faces separate litigation from the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC sued Deere in January 2025, at the end of the Biden administration, accusing the company of “unfair practices that have driven up equipment repair costs for farmers while also depriving farmers of the ability to make timely repairs.” Deere at the time said the claims were baseless.

“Right to repair” calls have piled up across sectors over the years, particularly as technology found its way into more and more products workers and consumers rely on. Beyond farm equipment, makers of goods like smartphones and video game consoles have also been accused of withholding tools or creating software-based locks that prevent even simple updates, unless they’re done by a shop authorized by the company — in turn, hampering independent repair businesses. Under public pressure, lawmakers in several states have tried to combat this.

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading…
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Associated Press

Related Posts

Is Rapper Welfare Fraud Worse Than Quarterback Welfare Fraud?

October 24, 2026

Artists Teach Fundamentals of Plein Air Painting at SAMFA

October 23, 2026

Sen. Perry Frames 2027 Legislature in San Angelo Town Hall

October 23, 2026

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter

This is our main newsletter. It contains the latest stories published on our website from the last week. It goes out on Wednesday at Noon.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Jeff Chandler Law
Archive
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Bluesky TikTok
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Ethics
  • Financials
  • Commenting
  • Business Directory
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

%d