Skip to content
Close Menu
The Concho Observer
  • Advertise
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Varmints
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Yearbook
  • Meet The Candidates
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Scam Alert: No, It’s Not a Sheriff’s Deputy Calling
  • Data Center Governance: What We’re Learning
  • Meeting Set for River Park Master Plan
  • SAMFA Begins a New Speaker Series
  • Polo Competition Coming to Historic Fort Concho
  • CASE Begins Work In Secret
  • A New Direction for the Concho Observer
  • City to Honor San Angelo’s Meals for the Elderly
Facebook Instagram TikTok
The Concho Observer
Subscribe
Saturday, March 7
  • Advertise
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Varmints
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Yearbook
  • Meet The Candidates
The Concho Observer
Home » LETTER: $33B Electric Project Not the Best Option
News

LETTER: $33B Electric Project Not the Best Option

EditorBy EditorSeptember 17, 20251 Comment3 Mins Read
Facebook Email Copy Link
Overseeing the Lone Star electrical grid, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, manages more than 52,000 miles of transmission lines within the state as of 2024. / LCRA photo
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
Webb, Stokes & Sparks

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Editor,

I am writing to share with you and your readership information about the forthcoming 765kV transmission lines, which ultimately will cover the state of Texas and impact just about every aspect of our lives.

The Texas Legislature passed HB 5066, which authorized the PUC to work with ERCOT to develop 3 major transmission lines to extend to the far west Delaware Basin.

The purpose is to provide future power demands to the oil and gas companies and planned data centers. This huge transmission line will cost $33 BILLION dollars.

Wikimedia Commons
Alpha Paving Ad

WE the “Texas Ratepayers” will be footing the bill for the lines by paying increased charges in our utility bills. We will pay not only with our electricity bills, but also with the degradation of our pristine land and water, directly and indirectly.

This is not just about landowners; it is about Texas and Texans. These massive lines will cross open land and wild Texas rivers that nourish all Texas and Texans.

We who live in the path of the transmission line will forfeit our land, our valuations, our sense of “joie de vivre.”

We will be exposed to Electromagnetic Pulses and Geomagnetic Disturbance, unless another $40 Million is spent on protective technology.

Our neighbors, who were not directly informed, nor have the line on their property will experience the same devaluation and risks without any remuneration.

None of the residents along the lines will be the recipients of the power generated by these lines.

There is much appreciation for reliable power but not at the expense of destroying the lands that have provided Texas and beyond with Food, Fiber and Energy for generations.

Instead of constructing power lines to generate power to benefit their industries, why not utilize the millions of MCF of gas that is currently flared off into the atmosphere daily, or the less expensive, safer and more direct microgrids? That would save countless miles of West Texas Landscape.

Remember, we are the ones who will pay the $ 33,000,000,000.

Please pass this information on to one and all, including your state and local representatives.

— Carolyn Quillen for EdwardsPlateauAlliance.org

EDITOR’S NOTE: According to information from the Public Utility Commission, House Bill 5066, passed by the Texas Legislature in 2023, and signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott, required
the commission to approve an electric reliability plan for the Permian Basin region in support of on-going
expansion and electrification of Texas’ oil and gas industry, and the growing communities of that area.

According to commission, the decision to go with 765 kilovolt transmission lines added and estimated 22 percent to the cost of the project, but officials said the long-term benefits would justify the extra expense.

The Delaware Basin is a below-ground geological sub-basin with prolific oil and gas reserves underlying far West Texas and southeastern New Mexico.

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor

Related Posts

Scam Alert: No, It’s Not a Sheriff’s Deputy Calling

March 5, 2026

Data Center Governance: What We’re Learning

March 5, 2026

Meeting Set for River Park Master Plan

March 5, 2026

1 Comment

  1. DONT MESS WITH TEXAS! on February 23, 2026 6:18 am

    PREACH! EVERYONE GO AND FILE PUBLIC COMMENTS AND OBJECTIONS AT THE PUC WEBSITE! https://interchange.puc.texas.gov/ search “765”

    Loading...
    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter

This is our main newsletter. It contains the latest stories published on our website from the last week. It goes out on Wednesday at Noon.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Postal Annex Ad
Archive
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Bluesky TikTok
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Ethics
  • Financials
  • Commenting
  • 2025 Yearbook
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d