Recent discussion surrounding the proposed Skybox data center highlights the importance of clear public information, not publicity, when communities evaluate projects of this scale.
Promotional materials and related media reporting frequently describe the project as a “$16 billion investment” in San Angelo. Yet industry estimates commonly used in the data-center sector place construction costs near $16 million per megawatt of electrical capacity, suggesting that figure corresponds to a much larger hyperscale campus—about one gigawatt—than the project currently being described publicly, which appears to be roughly 600–660 megawatts.
What, then, realistically would be the boost to the city’s property tax base? And when?
Large industrial developments are built in phases. As a result, the full tax base impact often highlighted in early announcements typically takes many years to appear on local tax rolls. For the proposed San Angelo data center, that could be seven years or more distant, based on the Skybox parent company, Emergent Data Center’s comments.
Meanwhile, the immediate socioeconomic impacts—construction activity, infrastructure demand, and housing pressure—arrive early.
San Angelo’s planning staff has already reported growing housing availability and affordability challenges in the city’s future. A major multi-year industrial construction project could intensify those pressures as sudden surges in new worker arrivals occur.
These questions do not mean the project will not ultimately benefit the community. But responsible civic decision-making requires clear and consistent information about project scale, infrastructure demands, and realistic timelines for completion and economic returns.
San Angelo residents deserve that public conversation with the full picture in view.
— Letter to the Editor by Richard Summers – 11 March 2026
