Skip to content
Close Menu
The Concho Observer
  • Advertise
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Varmints
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Yearbook
  • Meet The Candidates
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • School Closure Criteria On Workshop Agenda
  • TRUTHE: Never Trust the Flim-Flam Man
  • Scam Alert: No, It’s Not a Sheriff’s Deputy Calling
  • Data Center Governance: What We’re Learning
  • Meeting Set for River Park Master Plan
  • SAMFA Begins a New Speaker Series
  • Polo Competition Coming to Historic Fort Concho
  • CASE Begins Work In Secret
Facebook Instagram TikTok
The Concho Observer
Subscribe
Sunday, March 8
  • Advertise
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Varmints
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Yearbook
  • Meet The Candidates
The Concho Observer
Home » Conroe Considered Ordinance to Stymie Protests
Local Government

Conroe Considered Ordinance to Stymie Protests

Will McDanielBy Will McDanielOctober 13, 2025Updated:November 10, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Email Copy Link
The proposed ordinance over public gatherings was deferred after legal concerns were raised.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
Twin Mountain Fence

According to a public post made by the Democratic Party of Montgomery County, north of Houston, a proposed ordinance was recently deferred by the Conroe City Council, that would have required a $500 permit fee for any public gathering of more than 25 people, such as protests. Additionally, applicants would have to pay a $500 dollar deposit to the police department and be able to show proof of insurance for a policy worth at least $500,000 dollars. 

The item, which appeared on the agenda as “Item 9” reads: “Discuss and Consider the creation of an Ordinance setting requirements, fees, and penalty for non-compliance related to public or private mass gatherings within the City limits of Conroe, Texas. N. Mikeska”

Watch the full Conroe City Council meeting here.

The council appeared a little bit hazy itself on who exactly proposed the ordinance, with one council member stating that it was the Conroe Chief of Police who had added it to the agenda. Another council member asked for clarification before the Chief denied the claim. 

Webb, Stokes & Sparks Personal Injury Law

The chief did express his concerns about protests, adding that there had been some planning, saying: “[It’s] costing a lot of money to control, to prevent harm from the people that are protesting because they are standing next to a highway. I’ve expressed those concerns, and we were trying to come up with a plan, but I did not put that on the agenda.” 

The item was deferred before it could be called to a vote, after concerns were raised about its legality. It is now being considered by their legal team, since similar proposals in other cities resulted in thousands in lawsuits and legal fees for the municipality. 

What the citizens had to say: 

“Does the city council need to be reminded what the first amendment guarantees us?…the right [to protest] is enshrined in our constitution. What else do they have planned?”

-Antonio Ventura, citizen inquiry. 

“I’m here to speak about the mass gatherings ordinance that has been taken off the agenda…I would like to ask the council to please submit these ordinances through their legal department first, especially if they have the appearance of the imposition of Constitutional rights, or Texas Constitutional rights, as enumerated by Article 1 Sec. 27, which was ratified in February of 1876.” 

-Natalie King, Montgomery County Democratic Party Chair, citizen inquiry. 

“Picture this, 25 people gathered in a backyard…will these ordinary communal moments be subject only to those who can afford the luxury? This isn’t about safety, this is in reaction to the ‘No Kings Protest’. Otherwise, it wouldn’t have come up before now.” 

-Lucas Dollarhide, citizen inquiry. 

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Will McDaniel

Related Posts

School Closure Criteria On Workshop Agenda

March 8, 2026

TRUTHE: Never Trust the Flim-Flam Man

March 7, 2026

Scam Alert: No, It’s Not a Sheriff’s Deputy Calling

March 5, 2026

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter

This is our main newsletter. It contains the latest stories published on our website from the last week. It goes out on Wednesday at Noon.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Jeff Chandler Law
Archive
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Bluesky TikTok
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Ethics
  • Financials
  • Commenting
  • 2025 Yearbook
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d